Breakdown
Nickal and Pyfer both come in with real finishing threat, but they get there differently. Nickal is the more efficient striker, landing 59% of his significant strikes, absorbing just 2.29 a minute, and defending at 59%. He also brings the better wrestling: 2.11 takedowns per 15 minutes, 82% takedown defence and 31% control time. Pyfer lands slightly more volume (3.49 a minute) and carries more knockdown power at 0.91 per 15 minutes, but he is hittable, absorbing 3.33 a minute, and his takedown defence is 66%. The two are close in size, with Pyfer an inch taller and Nickal owning a one-inch reach edge.
Our model leans Pyfer at 58%, mainly because of his higher Elo (1631 to 1594), his four-fight win streak, and his knockdown rate. Nickal's cleaner striking and grappling numbers keep this close, and the one time he was KO'd is a flag against a power puncher. Pyfer's 260-day layoff and Nickal's 182 are factored in, though the model may underweight them. No market line is available for comparison.
Key question: can Nickal get Pyfer to the mat early enough to avoid his power, or does Pyfer's punching find him first?